Monday, 8 November 2010

Winter’s Bone

It’s a bit unfortunate how peripheral factors can’t help but influence the way you end up viewing movies. I’m almost certain that cynical mood I was in when I watched Winter’s Bone might have made me just a a little less receptive to the small-town troubles of Ree and her family. Incidentally, the unaffected tone of the film prevents the decidedly provincial theme from permeating the movie and turning me (with my severe cynicism) off. Thus, the obvious cinematic experience of the film turns into an interesting experience in what seems like voyeurism. Even though I don’t have the sort of brain willing to immerse myself in a film’s narrative, I will say that Winter’s Bone though not my favourite movie of the year is the one which follows its own rules the best. It’s always satisfying when a movie makes sense in its own world.
 
Narrative-wise the plot is simple, painfully so even. Ree is seventeen and in charge of her two younger siblings. Her mother is on the way to being catatonic and her father is due for court but missing. Their family house is a portion of his bond, and if he doesn’t turn up their house if forfeited. Naturally, he doesn’t. Winter’s Bone is not about plot, to be honest I’m not sure it’s about style either. Neither is particularly riveting. If anything, Winter’s Bone is about its performances – its lead performance to be exact. The film depends completely on Jennifer Lawrence’s ability to convince us of our plight. What makes her task difficult is that Debra Grankik (writer and director) doesn’t care to make the film whimsical, not in the slightest. The only bits of the narrative presented are the essentials – tearful confrontations are scant, and when present not romanticised in the least. Lawrence’s gift is her ability to reveal key bits of characters in a way that’s so natural it seems almost documentary-like. True, movies are movies but Winter’s Bone is the type of film that works in spite of (or maybe even because of) its capacity to seem pragmatic.
Oddly, it’s Lawrence’s ability to balance the film on her shoulders that ends up working out as a detractor of sorts. True, John Hawkes turns in a fair supporting effort but the narrative is interested in Ree at the expense of the supporting cast. In its defence, Winter’s Bone works better than films of the type – say Fish Tank for example – because it knows its limits. I wasn’t a big fan of Fish Tank because in its pseudo-naturalistic way it loses sight of its plot. Winter’s Bone works because of its singular plot. It doesn’t get preachy, even if the ending was just a little too sweet for my cynical self though. Cynicism aside, though, even I could take note of a good film when I see it. Winter’s Bone is not a perfect film, and in the grander scheme of things Jennifer Lawrence’s performance trumps the actual film. But in a year where the pickings seem woefully slim I’ll take what I can get - Winter’s Bone is a keeper.
          
B
   
[I know I promised more material in November, but seriously Uni – University, not Univarn – is kicking my ass. Review of The Social Network soon though...]

7 comments:

Castor said...

It's definitely a movie you need to be in the mood for, being quite minimalistic in how the story is told. Lawrence is very good and keeps this watchable throughout. Glad you liked it :)

Alex in Movieland said...

I also have a screener, but I'm making other films priorities right now, in my few free time. To me, from the trailer it looked just like a younger "Frozen River", which I most certainly didn't enjoy back then.

Nicholas Prigge said...

It is Lawrence's movie. You're right. If I had an Oscar vote....

But despite limited screen time I think you're undervaluing the part of the wife of the local mafioso boss. Her refusal to help and then the way she slowly comes around and, in the end, one woman helping another woman in this world of foul, meth-cooking men. This is just one of its themes and one of its themes that doesn't get shoved down the audience's throat because of its, as you said, singular plot. In other words, I really, really liked this movie.

Castor said...

@ Alex: It definitely reminds of Frozen in how "indie" and minimalistic it is...

Movielocker said...

Hi, Really like your blog. Nice insights and ideas!
Maybe you like to take a look on the one where I write some stuff for. We just started, so feel free to visit, take a look around and leave a message.
It´s getting a new design & layout pretty soon too and I write new entries nearly every day.
It centers around all different kind of movies, what I regulary watch and like- with focus on independent stuff.
Check out http://blog.movielocker.com
Keep it up!
All the best, Sebastian

rorydean said...

O.K. So I wasn't planning on posting ANOTHER thread here at Encore but then I found Winter's Bone and given my freshly posted article of the same film, I'm back. Drop over and take a look at mine if you'd like. I think we make some similar points, especially the minimalism, the sense of reducing the plot down to its most bare so that the subtle of the characters and the oddity of the "Ozark Woods" could come through. I don't know if the sense of place really came through for those who haven't actually experienced that kind of community, the gut-level no-government atmosphere that's about as thick in the air as skinning a fresh kill.

@Alex - Winter's Bone is a superior film to Frozen River, though obviously a good idea as they share some clear similarities.

@Nicholas - Nice, I agree, their scenes together speak volumes in that woman-e-woman thing (some men have it too but infrequently) where both feel and share a loss that other people just aren't capable of reaching and in those seconds they share an entire lifetime.

cheers->

Julian said...

I enjoyed Frozen River more than WInter's Bone, but that may be because Frozen moved a bit faster. I personally found Winters Bone a bit too slow moving, but i still think its a good movie.